The
Nuances of Poetry: The Context(s) of Writing and Reading
by
Bini B.S.
Poetry as an art form and musical expression predates literacy
as it was integral to ancient oral traditions and rituals across
the world. In common parlance, it comes across as a literary
creation wherein the beautiful or sublime are evoked without the
compulsive onus of engaging in rational thinking or resorting to
narrative rendition. That does not mean that poetry is illogical
and exists only in the abstract realms of feelings, emotions,
imagination and fantasy. Poetry may also contain elements of
philosophy and science; it can remain intensely personal or be
overtly political. The engagements with language and time in
poetry are also so varying; one can tap the subliminal and
abstract possibilities of language or dwell in the mundane.
Poetry may reinvent history; critique the present and prophecy
the future. A poet may be concerned about one’s times and
mindful of history, or intend only to confess the innermost
feelings and experiences through verse. Poetry may give the
reader a taste of personal or cultural memory and make one
reflect on the times. It may intoxicate one by submerging the
senses in the ecstasy of mellifluous sound and beautiful
expressions and thus make one be forgetful of surroundings.
Poetry comes in diverse guises in the contexts of its
writing/production and reading/reception.
The generic term, 'poetry' is highly problematic. Poetry has
myriad avatars: an aesthetic experience, a pleasurable medley of
music and meaning, a quest for profound truths, a vision of
life, a sensitive portrayal of society, an invitation to
traverse the secret recesses of mind, a clarion call for change
and many more. Poetry thus eludes the fixity of a definition and
the convenience of classification even if one discusses it with
reference to schools of poetry and literary movements. The term
itself proves inadequate to denote a particular genre
of literature as one comes across the bewildering variety of
poems and other writings in verse that differ so much in form,
style and content. Like in the case of any other creative
expression governed by imagination, emotion and sensitivity to
surroundings and time, rules of poetry cannot be formulated, nor
can one quantify its uses. Precisely for these reasons, it is
impossible to decide whether poetry is inspired or it results
from intentional contemplation; if one should be writing
according to the norms to rhythm, rhyme and meter or ignore them
altogether; if poetry fulfils some social obligation or is
written for sheer aesthetic enjoyment; whether it responds to or
grows out of a context or transcends the context; whether it
dreams of a changed world or looks back nostalgically at distant
or recent pasts and the like. The context(s) of the production
and reception of poetry and the milieu of the poet are
significant and one has to seek answers to all such queries with
regard to these. So while viewing poetry from any perspective,
one cannot rest in the comfort zones of generalization.
Plato wanted to banish poets from his ideal republic fearing
them to be a menace that could lead people astray into the
abstract, insane realms of the unreal. Poets are also seen as
visionaries endowed with prophetic powers and insight. In many
ancient cultures, they were respected as supreme artists
inevitable to assure the mental health of society. Poetry is
also expected by many scholars and poets themselves to be a
great moral and ethical force with its didactic appeal and
penetrative power.
Poetry has the potential to depict social crisis, the confusions
and agonies of an era and the troubles and tribulations in a
poignant manner. It has played a stunning variety of roles and
fulfilled several functions in different contexts in history.
During the French and Russian revolutions, Indian freedom
movement, political movements in Latin America and Africa,
Naxalite movement and similar situations, poetry could add fuel
to the passion of people. But poetry cannot be reduced to
propaganda. Propagandist poets are easily forgotten if their
appeal is momentary. To seep into the psyche of people and
influence emotions, poetry needs more techniques than mere
eloquence and demagoguery. Mayakovsky, Yates, Tagore,
Subrahmanya Bharati and Neruda are still remembered because they
took poetry to a different level than propaganda. A poet’s sway
on society and people is an enigmatic phenomenon in that it
cannot be measured in terms of the impact and its quality cannot
be assessed.

Poetry with its simplicity and beauty becomes a powerful weapon
and vehicle of expression. It, on certain occasions, descended
the ivory tower and communicated in a voice that was heard by
eager ears. Poetry triggers mass movements and invokes people
when it straddles thoughts and feelings, intellect and emotions
and thus appeals for action. A poet becomes immortal when each
passing generation is able to relate to the thoughts, emotions
and experiences contained in his/her lines. A poet is thus
reinvented and reinterpreted in and across time. Milton
envisaged literature to have a life beyond life; poetry lives
many lives in different spaces and times and is not embalmed in
the finality of a fixed meaning or response.
The theme of poetry is a debatable issue if one takes a
prescriptive stand. Poetry is deemed to be a subjective art, but
the artist is subjected to the influences of his/her context.
Though the personal and experiential elements are predominant in
the writing and reading of poetry, these processes are not
insular to the socio-cultural contexts and political scenario in
which a person as a writer or reader is part of. Poetry may have
a confessional vein, the need to reveal the unbearable joys and
pains may motivate one to pen a poem of love, parting, loss,
guilt and fear. Poets choose to respond to his times in nuanced
ways and readers associate different themes and meanings
according to their perspectives. Revolutionaries, feminists and
marginalized groups like Dalits have used poetry as an eye
opener and in their hands the pen became mightier than the
sword. Poetry can challenge several types of dominations; it can
be iconoclastic and a subversive activity. This is the reason
why poets like Ken Saro Wiwa are silenced by banishment, torture
or death.
The relationship between poetry and music is ambivalent. Poetry
can be musical and music may come under the category of poetry.
The dividing line between these two genres is blurred. Not only
that, music can give a new life to poetry and poetry can be the
heart of music. Rhyme and rhythm intensify the aesthetic
experience poetry conveys and also help the meaning to linger
longer in memory. At the same time, too much insistence on
musical elements and rigidity of form may lead to certain
compromises with the power and freedom of poetic expression.
Meter, rhythm and rhyme, in the case of classicists became very
restrictive. In contemporary poetry, many writers prefer not to
be constrained by metrical patterns and musical elements.
Moreover, popular music and film songs raise the claims to be
‘sung’ poetry in contrast to ‘recited’ poetry. The fine
demarcations between song and poetry appear irrelevant. Old
Hindi film music is an example of this. Experiments on poetic
form and style have yielded refreshing and highly innovative
results and such experiments may never come to a finis.

The translatability of poetry is another intriguing issue; how
to represent the cultural context in which it is produced and
how to take it to new cultural contexts wherein it is received
is important. Complex figures of speech, idiomatic expressions
and the lie make the translation of poetry more complex. Free
translations become a new creations altogether and one need not
lament that.
Poetry can explore the possibilities of innovativeness in
language, music and visual impact by coining new words and
idioms, inventing new rhythms and rhymes, structuring the
appearance of the poem on paper and combining it with other art
forms. Poetry can draw a vivid and vibrant picture with words
through symbolism and use of imagery and be mellifluous like
melodies. It can play in the background of dance and give soul
to music. It can ascend to the sublime and the transcendental,
hover in epic and philosophical heights and also percolate into
the public sphere and the domain of popular culture. In that way
poetry knows no limits and breaks up and breaks into boundaries.
|
|
|